|
Soundings
Spring, 2008

The text portions of Soundings are also available in Adobe
Acrobat format to access this
click here. To access this file, Adobe's Acrobat Reader is
required and is distributed free over the Internet from the
Adobe
Web Site.
Inside
This Issue:
Due to the new color Pictures this PDF file may take a moment to
open.
2008-2009 BUDGET PASSES
After considerable public discussion and review, this year’s budget
was passed at the February 23rd.board meeting by a
unanimous vote.
Throughout the lengthy budget review process beginning in October of
2007, the budget numbers moved up and down as increases were
proposed, savings were found and adjustments were made.
Of
particular concern were the costs associated with three additional
positions recommended by an analysis of staff needs: a Deputy
Community Manager, an Information Technology Network Manager and an
Administrative Clerk.
The
analysis was conducted after questions were raised at the November
budget workshop about whether TSRA had sufficient staff resources to
achieve the 2008-2009 goals adopted for the Sea Ranch in October.
At
the February 9th Budget Workshop, Board members took a
straw poll which kept the proposed new clerical position in the
budget, but asked that a more thorough assessment be made throughout
the coming year of the need for a Deputy Community Manager. It was
hoped that other staff increases approved in this year’s budget or
the reassignment of some duties might have a positive impact on the
Community Manager’s workload. The Board of Directors authorized the
$27,000 requested for Information Technology support but wanted to
see the results of the IT study currently underway and consider
contract options before committing to a full-time staff position.
The
BOD also kept the proposed reconfiguration of the Association’s
office and conference room space in the budget and recommended
approval of the Fire Safety Task Force and Fire Safe Council
proposal to add the equivalent of two more staff positions and a
chipper to remove ladder fuels in the forested areas at the south
end of The Sea Ranch. (See related article Finding The right
Balance for Fire Safety.)
Requests to fund a Central TPZ Forest Management Plan and improve
the safety and aesthetics of the Verdant View roadway easement were
also approved. Other budget items had been reviewed and approved at
earlier budget workshops in November and January.
After the changes from the February 9th Budget Workshop
were incorporated, the final budget was scaled down from the
projected assessment of $185 per month, which would have been a 14.%
increase, to $180 per month, a 10.5 % increase in monthly dues.
In
her report at the Mid-Winter Meeting, Board Treasurer Marti Campbell
noted that the long-term trend for dues increases has held steady at
about 6% with variations from year to year that have tended to even
out over the long run. (The dues increase for the current year was
3%.). The Treasurer’s Report, which provides an overview on the
budget process and breakouts on expenses has been posted on the TSR
website.
Those members wanting a more detailed background on both the budget
process and the reasons for specific budget requests will find a
wealth of information in the Budget Explanatory Materials Packet
also posted on the website at
http://www.tsra.org/pdf/explanatory.pdf. This document, which is
also available at The Sea Ranch Association office, indicates how
specific budget requests are related to the 2008-2009 organizational
goals approved by the BoD in October.
JOHN HORN NAMED SEA RANCHER OF THE
YEAR
Teacher, mentor,
inventor. Actor, carpenter, designer, gardener, biologist,
environmentalist. All-around great guy, hard worker, helper and
friend.
According to the
many cohorts and colleagues who nominated him for the honor, it
would be tough to find anyone who has worn more hats, pitched in
more willingly, or taken better advantage of the opportunities to
share his talents with the community than this year’s Sea Rancher of
the Year, John Horn. Whether he’s designing and building sets for
the Thespians during play season or digging into water meter pits
during a water emergency, John demonstrates an energy and enthusiasm
that inspire everyone around him.
Born in Seattle and
raised in Los Angeles, John joined the Navy after earning an AA at
Pasadena City College. During leave from his stint as a mechanic in
the Naval Air Force, he met his future wife Katie on a Southern
California beach in 1953. The two began dating and maintained a
long-distance relationship after John went back to sea —“she’s got a
whole stack of really corny letters,” he admits—and married in
1955. They moved into veteran’s housing at Occidental College and
John graduated in 1960 with a B.S. in Biology.
He went to work as
a high school biology teacher in the Los Angeles city school system
and quickly proved himself to be a man who went above and beyond the
traditional requirements of the job. When he was transferred to a
brand new school in 1962, he designed the layouts and helped build
the cabinetry for the equipment in all the science classrooms. He
became department chair and worked with department chairs at other
schools in the district to develop the biology curriculum. “I’ve
always thought of myself as an organizer,” he says. In 1975, he was
named California’s Biology Teacher of the Year by the National
Association of Biology Teachers.
Working summers,
John earned a Master’s degree in Biology at Washington State. The
whole family (John, Katie and their two children) relocated to
Washington for eight weeks each year, and it was during one of their
trips up the coast in 1964 that they first saw The Sea Ranch. They
eventually bought their lot in 1973, and “our friends thought we
were crazy,” John recalls. “They said, ‘You paid ten thousand
dollars for what?!”
Originally John’s
intention was to build a house himself, but he and Katie finally
decided to hire Don Jacobs to design and Matt Silvia to build it.
“We pretty much just trusted them to finish it,” he says, and, in
spite of a run-in or two with the Coastal Commission, the basic
house was completed in 1977 at a cost of twenty-nine dollars a
foot. John did get to do the finish work himself—flooring, tile,
painting and fencing.
The Horns put their
new house on the rental program and finally moved to the coast when
John retired in 1986. “Actually, moving here full-time was Katie’s
doing,” John admits. “She thought LA was just too hot and once she
found out what the weather was like here, that was it!”
During his first
ten years on the coast, John worked for rental agencies doing
handy-man and repair work, and also had a mowing business with about
thirty customers. At the same time, he jumped into several
volunteer activities. He signed up for the Posh Squash garden,
eventually becoming co-chair and acting as a day leader until 2006.
He joined the Native Plant Society and became involved in the Pampas
Grass Eradication Program, served as President and Vice President,
and edited the newsletter. He became part of the barn restoration
crew (where he was eventually awarded the title “Master Carpenter”)
and continues to work designing and building stage sets for the
Thespians.
“In addition to set
construction, (John) has been an actor in three plays and did
background voice in several others,” says Carol Emory, Thespian
producer. “Creating the magic of theater sets includes thinking
about all of the ideas from many angles, making everything safe (not
often simple), knowing what is impossible and then finding a way to
‘possible’.”
Last holiday
season, John contributed his skills to the Gualala Arts Theater
musical production of “Beauty and the Beast.” They needed an
“invention” for beauty Belle’s inventor father, Maurice. John
consulted with his granddaughter (who had played Belle in her high
school production) and went to work in his garage. The resulting
contraption delighted the audience as it steamed and whistled around
the stage, powered by Paulina Power, complete with a trap door
through which she popped to take her final bow.
John has also
served on the board at Gualala Arts, in addition to working on the
early construction of the Center and chairing the Sweet Shoppe at
Art in the Redwoods. He is in charge of handyman volunteers for
Community Resource Connection, and has served on the Sonoma County
Election Board. The list does indeed go on and on.
It’s obvious when
you talk with him that John and The Sea Ranch are a perfect fit. Not
only is he in tune with the tradition of volunteerism here, but with
the tradition of Sea Ranch commitment to environmental principles as
well. “If you’re a biologist, you’re an environmentalist,” he
says. “You can’t watch what’s going on in the world and not think a
lot of it isn’t bad for the planet. Everything is connected.”
MIDWINTER MEETING CELEBRATES COMMUNITY
By Nancy Carter, Chair,
Communication Committee
A funny thing
happened on the way to the MWM ! It wasn’t really a meeting, rather
a gathering of friends sharing information, ideas and expectations.
Witness :the sun was shining for the first President’s Day weekend
in years, beckoning all of us to enjoy the many reasons we came to
the Sea Ranch in the first place ; nevertheless, a limited and
spirited cadre of some 100 members filled the Del Mar Center Hall.
The Question & Answer period, sometimes a contentious affair,
consisted of only one question. The Board Treasurer’s report
reviewed how a proposed significant dues increase had been scaled
back and, to everyone’s surprise, no questions were asked. The Sea
Rancher of the Year award presented to John Horn (see accompanying
article) was almost a sentimental recognition of a member who
through his full time residency and years of service had paid his
dues many times over and was as popular a choice as could be
remembered..
The Midwinter
Membership Meeting is one of two meetings hosted annually by the
Communication Committee to bring members current on Association
business, to recognize the volunteer contributions of members as a
major part of Association activities and accomplishments, and to
strenghen our community cohesiveness.
Highlights
included :
Norman Wohlken,
Chair of the Election Committee, announced that four candidates
(Chris Beach, Martha “Dibby “ Tyler, John Forenti, and Derek Bray)
had filed as candidates for the 2008-2009 election. Jim Jordan,
Board Chair, turned our attention to another election, that of
Sonoma County Supervisor, and to the efforts to familiarize
candidates for that position to the needs and special issues of our
location and Association, and to invite members to a Meet the
Candidates reception and forum on March 29. Bob Pounds, moderator
of the meeting, highlighted how much Sea Ranchers give to the
Mendonoma community by asking volunteers in a variety of
organizations and activities to stand and be recognized, until
hardly a person remained seated. Our new Volunteer Coordinators,
Hanne Liisberg and Margie Hagen, explained their process and role in
assisting those who want to volunteer to be put in touch with groups
and organizations needing help.
Louise DeWilder,
Director of Emergency Services, updated the audience on continuing
improvements to the Disaster Operations Plan and its implementation,
citing lessons learned in the recent water and power outages this
winter. She stressed the need for all members to register their
home (Sea Ranch) telephone numbers for instant notification during
an emergency (See her current article in The Bulletin
for 3n System phone notification and registration).
Lisa Scott, the
Director of Design Operations, reported that California and Sonoma
County changes in building codes in designated wildlife-urban
interface areas, including the Sea Ranch, are conducting “ignition”
tests on wood used as exterior siding, and at the present time, only
horizontal tongue and groove siding is allowed, though debate is
still clarifying vertical siding and board and batten requirements.
Only new construction is affected by the changes. This code change
brought the only question to the presenters and Board . Lisa
answered the question, “Will changes in the code require changes to
the CC&R’s and a member vote on the changes ?“ The short answer is
that nothing in the code changes is in conflict with the CC&R’s
since changes in law and state regulation override the CC&R’s.
Two special
announcements followed : Jim Jordan conveyed Board member Rosemarie
Hocker’s apologies for missing the meeting, and that she is home at
the Ranch and convalescing from her serious illness. She sends her
thanks to all who supported and prayed for her during her absence.
The meeting chair then introduced past Sea Ranchers of the Year in
attendance, who in turn warmly welcomed John Horn to their special
group.
The short meeting
sent all scurrying to the Del Mar House for food, friends, and
fellowship. The three F’s highlight what this meeting is always
about.
NEW
FIRE CODE AFFECTS CHOICE OF BUILDING MATERIALS
By
Lisa Scott,
Executive Director, Department or Design Compliance and
Environmental Management
On
January 1, 2008, under Chapter 7A (Wildland Urban Interface) of the
2007 California Building Code, California implemented new
requirements for building practices and materials used in new
construction within CAL FIRE (formerly CDF) State Responsibility
areas. The Sea Ranch is included within these areas, which tend to
be non-incorporated, rural areas. The code targets damage to
structures caused by wind-borne burning embers which "lodge"
themselves into the openings on the exterior of a building and can
cause the structure to burn. Specifically, the new
code pertains to both residential and commercial projects and
addresses exterior siding, roofing, glazing, gutters, decking and
stairs, skirting of exterior underfloors, enclosure of exterior
soffits, and venting of building cavities.
A critical
aspect of the new code, and of primary concern to The Sea Ranch, is
the requirement for "non-combustible" or "fire-ignition-resistant"
exterior siding and decking materials.
Redwood and Cedar, the preferred choices for siding and decking at
The Sea Ranch, as well as other lumber products used
in
exterior construction must pass state-mandated fire tests in order
to be code approved. Therefore, wood product
organizations have been working with state officials in conducting
fire tests to meet the new standards and in acquiring product and
practice acceptance. Currently, the wood products (not chemically
treated) approved thus far, such as; Western Red Cedar, Incense
Cedar, Port Orford Cedar, Alaska Yellow Cedar and Redwood, all
require horizontal application with specific types of interlocking
joint profiles; tongue & groove being one of these. Further testing
is planned to expand the acceptance of other lumber products used in
exterior applications, with additional patterns (vertical), and
species expected to be approved in the near future. A complete and
detailed listing of approved products is located in the
Wildland-Urban
Interface Products Handbook (www.fire.ca.gov/wildland.php).
To obtain
a better understanding of the codes, you can access more information
at
http://www.fire.ca.gov and click on "Living
and Building in the Wildland Urban Interface (WUI)".
It is strongly
recommended that members planning to engage in a new construction
project access this website for further information and resource
listings.
Although these new codes apply strictly to new construction only
(not additions or remodels), it is important to pay attention to
other restrictions of the Wildland Urban Interface and 2007
California Building code enforcement. A few examples are the
requirement for specific applications of tempered glazing in
exterior windows, increased guard rail height, and the use of
approved ventilation methods. These specific requirements, when
used in combination with code-approved products, such as siding, are
crucial to protecting the structural integrity of a building in the
event of a fire.
FINDING THE RIGHT BALANCE FOR
FIRE SAFETY
By Jackie Gardener
Chair, Fire Safety Task Force
I was surprised in April,
2007 when Board Chair Jim Jordan asked me to join a new task force
to review all the work undertaken by TSRA for fire safety and
determine if any more needed to be done. I have avoided such
activities, but I understood that my association (by marriage) to
the sheep herd and my experience of windthrow gave me certain
credentials. I thought the work very important, so I agreed to come
on board.
Jim Platt began as chair
but I took over in August when he left to devote more time to the
Point Arena Lighthouse. Other members include Leigh Mueller,
Rosemarie Hocker, and Sandy Bush as members of the BoD, plus Bob
Hartstock, Tom Osborne, and Alex Long. Each of us represents
different perspectives and experiences. We started meeting in May
and were given a binder full of studies and plans reviewing fire
safety at TSR for the last twenty years, and a presentation by Bill
Wiemeyer was made on the Fuels Management Program (FMP)of 2002 and
its implementation.
It
didn’t take but one meeting to realize how complex fire safety is. I
was well aware of criticism that “uneducated” Sea Ranchers were
asked to make decisions for action plans and budget requests rather
than fire professionals. I wondered about it myself as I read
through reams of information and learned a new vocabulary about
crown fires and fuel load. Historically, TSRA had tried to blend
members with professionals on one committee, but the pros didn’t
want to be developing policy or determining feasibility, and the
learning curve for non-professionals made it hard to work on an even
playing field. So, at the same time the Fire Safety Task Force was
chartered, so was the Fire Safe Council.
The
FSC is comprised of TSR Fire Chief Dan Levin, CalFire Capt. Shelley
Spear, staff members Bill Wiemeyer, Randy Burke, John Prescott and
John Fox, plus members Pat Romeiro and Scott Graf along with
representatives of the insurance industry and PG & E. Aided by
liaison Louise DeWilder, our Disaster Preparedness professional,
this group began work on a matrix of fire safety priorities and
supporting projects. Capt.Spear and Bill Wiemeyer walked many parts
of the Sea Ranch to determine from boots on the ground exactly what
was lacking or not being addressed through the current FMP from
Spear’s professional perspective.
While
they worked on the matrix, we worked on learning all we could about
the sheep grazing program, the capabilities of our water system in
regards to fire fighting, and how to utilize risk assessment, GIS
systems and fire behavior modeling. We walked neighborhoods with
Capt.Spear to review the problems and benefits of PRC4291, the new
state law mandating a 100’ zone of defensible space around our
homes, and talked with the inspectors to learn what they had
learned. We reviewed member input from previous surveys, meetings
and studies, and looked in detail at what brought us all to TSR and
made us want to live in a major wildfire zone. We watched John
Prescott’s crew complete roadside fuel break reentry work to better
understand exactly what was being taken out and what’s left behind
and why. And we met with Carol Rice, the fire behavior consultant
who helped write our current FMP and asked what lessons had been
learned from recent wildfires that might change what we were doing
here.
There
is a strong ethic on the part of the FSTF members to make our
recommendations based on science and fact rather than emotion and
fear. Several times any number of us wanted to quit in frustration
and go have a margarita instead. But we didn’t. We stuck to it, we
bonded over the complex science of fire behavior and how to apply it
to the beautiful natural community we all cherish. And we have
learned a lot that we hope our community will benefit from.
Task
force members come from different parts of the Ranch, and we hold
different ideas about what fire safety means and its relative value.
We are engineers, artists, naturalists, teachers, and nurses, but
mostly we’re homeowners. We watched in horror this past fall as
fires sprang up all over the west and we felt pressure to make good
decisions based on hard information that were reasonable,
defensible, effective and affordable. We came to understand that we
cannot and do not want to limb up or chop down every acre of Sea
Ranch. As Dan Levin will tell you, the only way to make this place
safe is to pave it. No one understands that better than the FSTF and
the FSC.
I am
nearly ready to make my third appearance at the final budget hearing
to explain our priorities, our thinking, our decisions, and our
request for your money. We think we can add value, Sea Ranch value,
to your lives by addressing the top priorities developed by the FSC
and FSTF and decrease our risk of a crown fire while preserving our
natural environment to a high degree. We will be buying a new
chipper and putting several thousand extra man hours into the budget
to treat more of our streets for safe evacuation, clean up our PG&E
power line right-of-ways, create a mineral earth fire break between
Annapolis and the Lodge on the east side of the highway, and remove
pockets of the least healthy pine plantations closest to structures
and power lines.
Is it
enough? Is it too much? It is the first step, which creates an
expanded program in what will be a multi-year effort. We hope it is
a good balance of our values, a step towards a higher degree of fire
safety and less risk of the most dangerous crown fires. It looks
simple and direct, but many hours of research, study and discussion
went into developing this plan. We believe it is a good balance of
our priorities and concerns for a reasonable cost.
But
our work isn’t done yet. The task force will be in operation until
October 2008. We will be considering additional recommendations for
the next budget year based on the priorities and workload currently
being defined by the Fire Safe Council. We are also planning member
education meetings this summer to share with you our processes and
findings. Feel free to contact members of the task force to ask
questions or share your concerns.
STEWARDS PRESENT GUALALA POINT ISLAND STUDY
By Diane Hichwa,
member of the Stewardship Task Force
When you walk past Gualala Point Island
(GPI), I hope you will look at it with different eyes. During the
nesting season, April through August, as you view the rock from the
bluff trail you may encounter a small but noisy black bird with a
long red beak, the American Black Oystercatcher, often near the
tideline. Looking due west at the rock, the entire visible top--a
large triangle-- holds the nests of Western Gulls. A small
collection of plant material marks the locations, but as the
speckled downy chicks grow and move around the nest material is
quickly scattered or reused by another bird. During the nesting
period the adult gulls discourage other birds from landing on the
top: immature Western Gulls stay down on the water while Brown
Pelicans are chased off the top.
Geologic factors make GPI unique and a
favorable habitat for colonial seabirds. Brandt’s Cormorants are big
stocky black birds and have a brilliant blue spot just behind the
beak during the breeding season (best viewed in good light and
through a spotting scope). They are a colonial nesting seabird and
GPI is the only island in the ten miles of our Sea Ranch coastline
that is large enough, flat enough, and suitable to host a colony of
this species. If you could look directly down from above you would
find, on the open ocean side of the top, an array of Brandt’s
Cormorant nests. Most of these are spaced apart exactly as far as
the cormorant’s neck reaches to an adjacent nest. In a tiny window
from the south some of their nests are visible from shore; viewed
from above 90 nests are clustered together. Perched or nesting on
shelves along the north side of the island you may see Pelagic
Cormorants-- slimmer and longer-necked than the Brandt’s and in
breeding season wearing an obvious pair of white flank patches. If
you look carefully you may notice small black birds with bright red
feet, Pigeon Guillemots, sunning themselves near the vertical
crevices in which they lay their eggs. The tideline is where some
harbor seals haul out to rest.
We are Stewards of the California Coastal
National Monument working with the BLM to protect and monitor
approximately 500 offshore islands. The Task Force wants to again
thank all who volunteered in the 2007 effort—observers,
photographers, the pilots who made all of the aerial photography
possibly, data entry and committee members. We also want to
acknowledge the assistance of the biologists of the BLM and the
USFWS in providing their expertise for the protocol design and the
interpretation of the data. The monitoring efforts in 2007 and the
expanded efforts that we are putting into place in 2008 help us to
meet our commitments with the BLM.
Sixteen people from our coastal area
attended the December 14, 2007 meeting of the California Coastal
Commission (CCC) in San Francisco, where the Task Force made a
presentation of our monitoring of seabird disturbance during last
July’s fireworks in Gualala. Gerry McChesney, a U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service biologist with expertise in seabirds, explained the
following: “There was quite a bit of nest abandonment immediately
after the fireworks display, within just a couple of days. From my
own experience studying Brandt’s Cormorants over the years it is
really unusual to see such a high rate of nest abandonment over such
a short period of time. They usually only abandon nests so rapidly
due to predation or some kind of disturbance event. That’s in my
experience studying them over the last 20 years. There does seem to
be some kind of strong association with the fireworks display and
nest abandonment. When we compare what happened at Gualala Point
Island with the 3 colonies we monitor in Central California: we had
upwards of only 10% at most abandonment over the entire nesting
season at the colonies we followed; the GPI colony definitely has
much higher rates of abandonment than our colonies did.”
The value of the
effort made in 2007 was acknowledged in a letter from the Pacific
Seabird Group to the CCC that stated, “Little has been published
regarding the impact of fireworks on seabird colonies, and
consequently the data gathered by the task force are of great
interest. To the credit of the task force, the documentation of its
protocol and the publication of its findings are well presented. Of
importance is the documented impact of the fireworks on the nesting
Brandt’s Cormorants, where 11% of the nests were abandoned at the
time of the fireworks event. The documentation by photography,
including night photography, indicates that the cormorants reacted
quickly and many left the island during the event. … An avoidable
disturbance that causes as much as 10% of a population to fail in
its breeding attempts is unwarranted.“
Point Reyes Bird Observatory, in their
letter to the CCC, stated, “Colonies of breeding seabirds
such as cormorants and murres are particularly vulnerable to human
disturbance. At sea most of their lives, they come ashore to breed
in large colonies. Nesting closely in dense colonies, these
seabirds rarely leave eggs and chicks unattended. Their greatest
natural enemies, the gulls, are quick to respond to the flushing
events caused by the close approach of planes, boats, humans,
inanimate objects, and loud noises. Widespread egg or chick loss,
as well as permanent desertion of the colony, can potentially result
from a single disturbance incident. As birds of the open ocean,
seabirds are important allies in the effort to conserve marine
environments.”
In 2008 the CCNM Task Force is looking
for volunteers to assist in several projects. We will institute
long-term monitoring in two forms. One is independent of the nesting
season: a quarterly hike will be initiated to walk the length of the
Sea Ranch (divided into several teams and sections) to note which
islands have plants, which islands have seasonal use by birds for
roosting or nesting, and which are used by seals. The other
long-term component will be a weekly observation during the nesting
season (April – August) of three islands known to host nesting birds
(Black Point, Galleon’s Arch and GPI) to determine the species and
numbers of nests on each island. In addition to the long-term
monitoring projects we will continue a period of intensive
monitoring at GPI in late June and early July to expand the data
collected during the same time frame in 2007.
If you want to get out along the coast
and learn new skills, step forward now as a volunteer. We will
schedule training in the Spring. This Stewardship Task Force is
co-chaired by Paul Gudiksen (gudiksen@pacbell.net)
and Rich Kuehn (windnsea@hughes.net). Please contact them if you
would like to volunteer for any of the monitoring
Editor’s note: based in
part on the presentation of the Stewardship Task Force findings, The
Coastal Commission determined that a Coastal Development Permit will
be required for any future fireworks display over the Gualala
Estuary.
SEA RANCH
AFFECTED BY PROPOSED MARINE RESERVES
More than 100 people turned out for a
public workshop held in Gualala on February 5thto
take a look at the State’s second round of draft proposals for
increasing protection of coastal habitats from Alder Creek to
Salt Point.
Four draft proposals were presented for
discussion. In a significant departure from the first round, a
main focus of the proposals was on the southern end of The Sea
Ranch. All of the proposals presented recommend that part of The
Sea Ranch coastline be set aside as a “no take” State Marine
Reserve.
This meeting was part of a statewide
process of reviewing and expanding current state Marine
Protected Areas into a cohesive network of marine life
protection under the 1999 California Marine Life Protection Act
(MLPA) After one further round of proposals, final
recommendations for new reserve areas will be forwarded to the
Fish and Game Commission in April for review and approval.
EFFECTS ON THE SEA RANCH
.A small state marine reserve has already
been established at Del Mar Landing on The Sea Ranch. Currently
Sea Ranch residents, renters and public access visitors can fish
and dive for abalone everywhere except in the Del Mar reserve.
Any new reserve established would prohibit recreational “take”
for fishermen and abalone divers and any other harvesting of
marine life
While the protection of marine life is
consistent with Sea Ranch values, there are some concerns about
the draft proposals. Some of the more extensive proposals might
lead to trespass problems for the southern end of the Sea Ranch,
and, at the same time, could cause depletion of marine life at
the northern end of The Sea Ranch, where take would be
permitted.
State marine reserves must be maintained in
an “undisturbed and unpolluted” state. If more stringent
standards are applied to surface runoff pollutants in the
future, the Sea Ranch could be required to prevent surface water
runoff from reaching the reserve areas.
BREAKOUT SESSIONS
At the meeting’s breakout sessions there
was lively and sometimes heated discussion about the effect on
the three main areas where reserves have been proposed: Point
Arena, Saunders Reef and the coastline from Salt Point to the
Sea Ranch.
Salt Point to The Sea Ranch
Sea Ranch staff, volunteers and members
participated as did members of the Richardson family, who own
ranch property along the coastline between Salt Point and the
Sea Ranch and were concerned about the restrictions on fishing
and diving for private property owners.
Point Arena
Representatives from Point Arena presented
an alternative proposal at one breakout session which would meet
concerns of commercial fishermen by maintaining the current
reserve north of Point Arena but moving additional protection
south to Saunders Reef. Fishermen were primarily concerned about
proposed reserve boundaries around Point Arena that would
require them to contend with rough currents and tides. They also
asked that boats be allowed to transit through protected areas
with fish caught in unrestricted areas.
Saunders Reef
Saunders Reef, which extends from Iversen
Point to Schooner Gulch, is an area with a rich diversity of
marine life.. All the draft proposals, including the one from
Point Arena, would designate Saunders Reef as a State Marine
Conservation Area, which is less restrictive than a State Marine
Reserve.
MLPA PROCESS
The draft proposals under consideration
have been developed by working groups of the North Central Coast
Regional Stakeholder Group, which is responsible for identifying
areas in need of protection along the North Central Coast Region
extending from Alder Creek down to Pigeon Point in San Mateo
County. Comments from the breakout sessions and other sources
will be incorporated in the next and final round of proposals.
Detailed information about draft options
being considered and upcoming meetings can be found at the
dfg.ca.gov/mlpa website. More background information can also be
found in the Winter 2007 Soundings. Those wishing to
comment on the options are encouraged to post comments on the
website or contact program manager Melissa Miller-Henson at
Melissa@resources.ca.gov.
A Board subcommittee has been formed to
review with Sea Ranch staff the various alternatives presented
in the draft proposals and to recommend the options they
consider to be in the best interests of the Sea Ranch
Association and its members. LM
Boxed or screened
At the February 23rd board
meeting, the Board voted to propose an alternative.option, which
resembles Draft Proposal 2 (JD) but would also retain the Del
Mar Landing reserve. This option would place the northern end of
the reserve just south of the Stengel Public Access and would
allow for recreational fishing and diving at most of the public
access points on The Sea Ranch while creating an extensive
reserve to the south.
DRAFT PROPOSALS BEING CONSIDERED
The primary goal of the MLPA is to protect
the natural diversity and abundance of marine life. Under the
MLPA, there are three levels of protection: a State Marine
Reserve, which prohibits taking any marine life a State Marine
Park, which prohibits commercial fishing but may allow limited
recreational useand a State Marine Conservation Area, which may
permit commercial or recreational harvest of some marine species
while protecting others.
All four
proposals recommend setting aside part of The Sea Ranch coast as
a full State Marine Reserve, which would mean that no marine
life of any kind could be harvested. Draft Proposal One
recommends a reserve that would extend all the way from Salt
Point to north of the Stengel-Knipp Barn while Draft Proposal
Four recommends a State Marine Reserve extending from Salt Point
Marine Park through Black Point.
•Draft
Proposal Two (JD) recommends a reserve extending from along the
shoreline just south of Black Point north to Walk On Beach
combined with a State Marine Conservation Area extending out to
the two-mile State limit.
•Draft
Proposal Three (TC) recommends a State Marine Reserve which
would extend from Salt Point Marine Park north to the Pebble
Beach public access along the shore combined with a State Marine
Conservation Area out to the two-mile State limit.
GERIATRICIAN MANA HOBSON JOINS LIVING WILL PROGRAM
By Claire
McCarthy
(This is the
second in a series of articles about the programs and providers of
Living Well, RCMS’ new holistic health program for adults over 60)
When Mana Hobson
got an intriguing email from one of her former Sutter Residency
students, she was very busy and happy with her thriving home care
and geriatrics practice in Santa Rosa.
Melissa Gosland,
RCMS family practice physician, was writing to say that the clinic
had just received a federal grant for the Living Well program, and
she wondered if Mana knew anyone who might be interested in
practicing geriatric medicine on the coast. Mana “thought for about
thirty seconds,” she says, before replying that she herself would
love to be considered for the job.
“I always had a
dream about building a cabin in the woods,” she says, and the
combination of living so close to nature and being part of a team of
holistic health care providers for older clients was irresistible.
“The Living Well program is so good,” she says, “because it works
across the whole spectrum (of geriatric issues), from wellness and
prevention to frailty and chronic illness.”
Mana confesses that
when she started college her interests lay more in the direction of
English, theater and anthropology than science. But her dad had
always encouraged a career in medicine, so to please him she took a
few science classes. She discovered that she enjoyed them, and it
was a course in Medical Anthropology that especially fascinated her
and captured her heart, eventually leading to her decision to become
a doctor.
Although it is a
difficult specialty, geriatrics was always her first choice. “I
like to help people solve their problems,” she says. “Geriatrics is
the most service-oriented of the specialties” and seemed to fit best
with her talents and goals as a doctor.
Through her
experience as a Geriatrics Educator at Sutter, as well as with the
Senior Health Center there and her own practice, Mana is very
familiar with many types of programs for seniors, and is excited
about the possibility of bringing some of them to the coast. She
mentions, for example, how beneficial it can be for both patients
and caregivers to have a dementia day care program, and cites the
need for more residential care options like Equinox, and more
private paid attendant care, especially for short shifts.
Although Living
Well has only been up and running since December, Mana is excited
that the program has already generated a lot of interest. “We are
happy that all kinds of seniors are coming in to meet with me and
are benefiting from our expanded services in nutrition, fitness and
nurse case management,” she says.
For more
information about Living Well and its services, contact director
Suzanne Miller at 882-2189.
LOCAL NON-PROFITS EXPLORE
COLLABORATION
By Marghi Hagen
Our local
charitable organizations encounter problems above and beyond the
typical issues that confront urban non-profits such as raising
enough money and finding enough volunteers. Communities such as the
Redwood Coast have these problems plus at least four additional
issues:
1) the over abundance of fund
raising events that compete both for attendees and dates.
2) the inundation of requests by
local charities on local business owners.
3) a shortage of people who are
familiar with managing a non-profit organization
4) a shortage of people experienced
in effective board directorship.
Over the past several months, as
many as fifteen small non-profits have met to explore ways of
channeling their energies more effectively in order to better serve
this community and interact more efficiently with each other.
Ideas such as creating a master
volunteer database as well as a master calendar of community events
have been proposed. Combining fund raising events, creating a master
website for all local non-profits, and addressing the issue of
community burnout due to on-going requests for donations and a
shortage of volunteers have also been discussed.
Yet making this kind of change can be difficult and even frightening
for a small organization. So, to explore these ideas further and to
provide training on the day to day running of a small non-profit, a
three-day workshop was held at the Gualala Arts Center at the end of
February.
Training sessions were scheduled on
refining goals and mission statements; board and volunteer training;
budgeting and long term financial planning; ethics; interagency
collaboration; grant writing; and effective fund raising.
More than 30 representatives from
local charities met to explore the potential for collaborative
interaction between some or all of the Redwood Coast non-profit
agencies and to address the potential for making positive changes,
whether or not they involve the small charities continuing to meet
and work together.
At the end of the
three-day training, enthused participants decided to continue
exploring ways of collaborating and to begin implementing some of
the ideas that were discussed at the seminar, such as a community
newsletter, a master calendar of events, and holding monthly
“mixers”.
The newly formed Redwood Coast
Charitable Alliance is off to a promising start. In the next issue
of Soundings, we hope to have more news about what we have
accomplished.
If you would like more information
on this project, please contact Marghi Hagen at
bksmvs@aol.com.
NEW ASSOCIATION WEBSITE DESIGN
UNDERWAY
By Anne B. Long,
Chair, Website Committee
For nearly a year and a half, the Website Committee has been
asking questions, interviewing staff, committee members, and Sea
Ranch owners to define a new website.
Can we have photo albums? Can we have videos? What about
activity groups--can they have their own pages? What can we do
about the calendar? Will our new vendor be responsive? Does
anyone realize how much material is on the old site? How much
should we move to the new one? What do the members really want?
At last, we’re busy implementing ideas and requests in a new
design, in new software, and with new features. In the process,
we’re discovering ideas that won’t work, material that doesn’t
logically fit anywhere, and features that don’t work the way we
expected. But, we’re also discovering interesting new ways to
present material and opportunities to highlight long buried
information.
When will the new site be ready? Like any good software
development team, we can’t give a firm date. But we do know it
will be sooner than John Fox expected and later than we had
hoped. We still have some unresolved implementation issues and
the time required for staff review is uncertain. We’re targeting
a launch in late Spring.
Our design and now implementation of this new site has its basis
in meeting these three goals:
1.
To
serve as a
primary means of communication from the Community
Manager, Association departments, and the Board of Directors to
our members.
2.
To
contribute to the
cohesiveness of our community by providing space for
member activity groups and committees to present information to
members. The new site includes photo albums and a member
directory where members may choose to provide information and
photos of themselves. Activity groups and committees will have
their own pages.
3.
To
facilitate continuing access to our many
remarkable documents and publications about our
neighbors, our facilities, and the environment; including
Soundings, the Bulletin, and the Comprehensive Environmental
Plan. Links to parts of these documents appear in context
throughout the site.
What’s Different
·
Finding
information more easily:
A menu bar across the top of the page provides menus for easier
navigation. Pages are shorter. We use more tables. We provide
more descriptions of files before you click on them. Like the
old site, there is a search capability.
·
Enabling
the Community Manager to post sensitive material:
Most of the site is restricted to Sea Ranch owners. There is a
public Home page and a member Home page. Sea Ranch Owners will
need to become members of the website before they can enter the
member section
·
Facilitating maintenance:
We are using a service to provide the software and hosting for
the site. The service will regularly introduce new features, so
we can keep up with new technology. We now have a user manual
and someone to call for support so that new staff members can
easily learn how to implement parts of the site and resolve
problems.
The accompanying screen shot shows the “beta” version of the
Member Home page. It won’t be long!
What You Can Do
Be sure the Association has your email address. When the site is
launched, you will receive an email that will take you to the
new site. If your property has more than one owner, each
individual owner may submit an email address and have an
individual membership in the new website.
If your activity group has not been contacted to prepare its web
page, email
ablong@mcn.org.
FERAL CAT TASK FORCE A
SUCCESS
By Dianne Rasmussen
Co-Chair Feral Task Force
In July of 1999, the TSRA
BoD established The Feral Cat Task Force in order to stabilize the
numbers of feral cats living on The Sea Ranch. Our small group of
volunteers has trapped, altered and released or socialized over l25
cats to date. In the first three years of the program, nearly l00
cats were trapped and treated. Costs to The Sea Ranch Association
were minimal, as a fund which covered all veterinary costs for
spaying and neutering feral cats had been established through the
San Francisco SPCA. Additionally, many Sea Ranchers have offered
generous donations for medical treatments of cats as treatments have
been needed.
What is a feral cat?
Among the many
controversies surrounding feral cats is the issue of the name
itself. Some groups don’t care for the term, preferring words like
”stray”, “abandoned”, “roaming”, or “unowned”, terms which may say
more about our perceptions of pet ownership than about the cats
themselves. Alley Cat Allies, one of the largest organizations
dedicated to the humane management of feral cats, offers this
definition: ”Feral cats are the offspring of stray or abandoned
domestic cats who revert to a wild state. Raised without human
contact, they are fearful of humans”.
Our experience with the feral cat population on The Sea Ranch
exceeded the expectations set out for our group. We have been
unable to locate any new litters in the past four years. However, we
have rescued many abandoned adult cats who were successfully adopted
through our local Humane Society.
You can identify altered feral cats on The Sea Ranch by their
clipped or notched right ear which indicates that they are spayed or
neutered. If you have any questions about a cat in your
neighborhood or if you notice a healthy or an ill adult cat or
kittens that need our attention, please do call me at 785-0099 or
Connie Schimbor at 785-2626 or The Sea Ranch office at 785-2444.
Please continue to help us as we greatly appreciate your assistance.
Although the work has been time consuming, this has been a very
satisfying endeavor for each of us in our group. We feel we have
made a difference both to the preservation of our cherished
environment and to the health and well-being of these unfortunate
misplaced animals. We are pleased to tell you of our success.
SOUNDING OFF - LETTERS TO
THE EDITOR
Dear Editor:
We have an extensive process of
budget hearings for the membership, making reams of information
available. And we pass our audits with flying colors.
And yet, despite good people, and
good intentions, we are burdened with a fundamental flaw in our
system. We do not track staff time by project or subject
matter. So then, how can we tally up the real price tag
of any given task or project? We can’t. And that leaves a big
hole in terms of real accountability to the membership.
Probably some projects and functions
are not worth what they are costing us, and would be better
eliminated. The money could be reallocated to reducing the
dangerous fire fuel load or other urgent needs. But how can we
make reasonable decisions, when we don’t have the necessary data
documenting the cost of staff time? This is especially true for
administrative tasks. And especially true for budgets heavily
dominated by personnel costs, as ours is.
We have a lot of process, paper, and
power point. Our meetings are festooned with documentation,
and frothy with factoids. But we’ve inherited a system that
does not collect necessary data with which to answer the most
fundamental questions: What's the total cost, including staff
time? Is it worth it?
This is a chronic problem for us,
well known to many. Are our dues dollars spent benefiting The
Sea Ranch and its membership, or not? Which do? Which don’t?
We can only guess.
It’s daft to go on this way. It's
not a negative reflection on our workers, it's a reflection on
ourselves.
Why do we keep pretending that our
present budget system is OK?
Why don’t we account for staff time
by project?
How long will we turn a blind eye to
the obvious?
CE Brown
Editor’s Note: According to Association
staff, detailed budget information on project costs, including
allocation of staff time, is provided in several documents
available to the membership.
The Property & Equipment Replacement Reserve and the
Development and Reserve Funds include the full cost of each
completed project, including labor. The Quarterly Capital
Projects Report includes a breakdown of labor costs for all
major projects in process. The Explanatory Materials for this
year’s budget include a detailed breakout of labor costs,
including the percentage of staff time spent on each
departmental function. All Facilities & Resources labor is
tracked by facility or function. Members interested in detailed
project budget information are welcome to call the Association
office.
Interim Plans For "Soundings"
This issue is our first
interim edition of Soundings as we search for a new editor to
maintain the excellent standards that Kathi and Duane Gordon have
established.for our community newspaper. I have enjoyed serving as
the first interim editor and experiencing first-hand the challenge
of putting together this issue of Soundings.
I want to thank the many
members who willingly and capably contributed to this edition.
Thanks also to Kathi and Duane, who continue to do the layout of the
articles and photographs for Soundings.
We hope to announce our
new editor in the June issue of Soundings. In the meantime,
Nancy Carter, Chair of the Communications Committee, steps in as
interim editor for the next edition. If you have story ideas or wish
to write an article for the next issue of Soundings, please contact
Janice Bonora at the Association Office at 785-2444 or
jbonora@tsra.org.
"Soundings" Editor Position Available
The position of Editor in Chief
for Soundings, a quarterly publication for Sea Ranch members, was
previously advertised as a volunteer position. To encourage more
applicants, the position will now offer a small stipend per issue.
The Editor will
collaborate with the Communication Committee to assign writers and
photographers, edit and proof copy, work with the Art Director and
Advertising Director, approve final layout, and coordinate content
with Association staff. Prospective candidates must be
self-directed, have demonstrated ability to write and edit in a
balanced manner and be skilled in the use of computers. Experience
with and knowledge of The Sea Ranch is also important.
A resume and
samples of recent work should be submitted by March 30, 2008, to
Nancy Carter, Chair of the Sea Ranch Communication Committee, P.O.
Box 1706, Gualala, CA. 95445-1706.
|